Breaking: Whistleblower Is CIA Officer –  Brennan Protégé Planted Inside White House To Spy On Trump

(Gateway Pundit) – The Deep State whistleblower is a CIA officer who was detailed to work at the White House, according to a new report by the New York Times.

Little is known about this ‘whistleblower’ but the Times reported that he has since returned to the CIA.

The whistle-blower who revealed that President Trump sought foreign help for his re-election and that the White House sought to cover it up is a C.I.A. officer who was detailed to work at the White House at one point, according to three people familiar with his identity.

The man has since returned to the C.I.A., the people said. Little else is known about him. His complaint made public Thursday suggested he was an analyst by training and made clear he was steeped in details of American foreign policy toward Europe, demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of Ukrainian politics and at least some knowledge of the law.

Lawyers for the whistle-blower refused to confirm that he worked for the C.I.A. and said that publishing information about him was dangerous.

The C.I.A. officer did not work on the communications team that handles calls with foreign leaders, according to the people familiar with his identity. He learned about Mr. Trump’s conduct “in the course of official interagency business,” according to the complaint, which was dotted with footnotes about machinations in Kiev and reinforced with public comments by senior Ukrainian officials.

“Any decision to report any perceived identifying information of the whistle-blower is deeply concerning and reckless, as it can place the individual in harm’s way,” said Andrew Bakaj, his lead attorney and Biden donor. “The whistle-blower has a right to anonymity.”

House Intel Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) on Thursday told reporters that he will be calling in the whistleblower to testify.

Schiff added that the whistleblower’s testimony will “help identify some other individuals to corroborate” allegations in the complaint.

Acting DNI Joseph Maguire publicly testified before the House Intelligence Committee Thursday morning about the Deep State spy trying to be passed off as a heroic whistleblower by the Democrat-media complex.

President Trump attacked the whistleblower’s sources on Thursday and hinted at harsh punishment for the Deep State spies.

“I want to know who’s the person who gave the whistle-blower the information because that’s close to a spy,” Trump said according to the New York Times. “You know what we used to do in the old days when we were smart with spies and treason, right? We used to handle it a little differently than we do now.”

No surprise the Deep State hit is coming from the CIA because the entire Russiagate coup plot to remove Trump began with former CIA Director John Brennan.

RUMBLINGS: Deep State Whistleblower is Brennan Protégé Planted Inside White House to Spy on Trump, Thwart Spygate Investigation

Like clockwork, within minutes of the New York Times releasing its report on the CIA ‘whistleblower,’ former CIA Chief John Brennan praised the ‘whistleblower’ and demanded lawmakers work against President Trump.

Rumors are swirling that the Deep State whistleblower is a John Brennan protégé who was planted inside of the White House to spy on President Trump and thwart the Spygate investigation.

PAUL SPERRY: Rumors swirling the anti-Trump whistleblower was one of Brennan’s old CIA humps detailed over to — planted inside — the White House to spy on Trump and help thwart the investigation of #Spygate which also involves Obama DOS/FBI/CIA skullduggery in Ukraine

Former CIA Chief John Brennan was the architect of Spygate and unleashed the might of the CIA and other intel agencies to target Donald Trump in order to remove him from office.

The transcript of the July 31 phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was declassified and the full, unredacted 5-page transcript was released Wednesday morning.

The transcript destroyed the Democrat-Deep State-media narrative that Trump threatened Zelensky or engaged in quid pro quo to get him to agree to investigate Joe Biden’s son Hunter for his involvement with Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian natural gas company.

But the Deep State is worried about something much larger than Biden’s shakedown of Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin.

The transcript also revealed that President Trump is actively investigating Russiagate and asked Zelensky to get to the bottom of CrowdStrike, the cyber-security company that investigated the DNC servers and concluded they were hacked by Russians in a dual operation dubbed ‘Fancy Bear’ and ‘Cozy Bear.’

Screenshot below:

A refresher on Crowdstrike and how Comey’s FBI dropped the ball (purposely):

The DOJ recently informed the court in a filing in response to Roger Stone’s motion to compel unredacted CrowdStrike reports that it doesn’t even posses the unredacted reports on the so-called ‘hack’ of the DNC servers.

The DNC’s lawyer provided the CrowdStrike reports to the US government with redactions and claimed the redacted parts were not relevant to the investigation.

And surprise, surprise — the FBI never looked into it.

“By May 2016, the DNC and the DCCC became aware that their computer systems had been compromised by intrusions, and they hired the cyber-security company CrowdStrike to identify the extent of the intrusions and mitigate the threat,” the filing stated.

So there you have it. CrowdStrike gave the US government three “draft reports” on the so-called hack which was full of redactions and the FBI just took their word for it that the Russians hacked the DNC servers.

Former FBI Director James Comey testified that the FBI asked the DNC for the compromised servers several times and they refused to hand them over to the bureau.

Instead of taking the servers, Comey and the DNC agreed that CrowdStrike would investigate the so-called ‘hack’ and they ultimately churned out three “draft reports.”

It appears Biden is just collateral damage in the latest Deep State hit by the CIA ‘whistleblower’ because the real fear is Trump obtaining concrete evidence that the Russians never hacked the DNC servers — this would ultimately take down the entire Deep State, Obama, Hillary Comey, Brennan, Mueller and the Russia hoax.

thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/surprise-whistleblower-is-cia-officer-detailed-to-work-at-white-house-and-has-since-returned-to-the-cia/

Former Mitt Romney Adviser Sits On Burisma Board Of Directors

(Breitbart) – Joseph Cofer Black, a national security adviser for the 2012 Mitt Romney campaign, sits on the board of directors of Burisma Holdings, the Ukrainian oil and gas giant that paid at times more than $83,000 per month to Hunter Biden, former Vice President Joe Biden’s youngest son.

The American Thinker, which first brought the story to light, noted it is “an odd coincidence that Mitt has as CNN puts it ‘been a lone Republican voice expressing concern about President Donald Trump’s July phone call with Volodymyr Zelensky in which Trump asked Ukraine’s President to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his family.’”

In October 2011, Romney announced that Black, who had served in the CIA since 1974, had been selected as a special adviser.

“I am deeply honored to have the counsel of this extraordinary group of diplomats, experts, and statesmen,” Romney said at the time. “Their remarkable experience, wisdom, and depth of knowledge will be critical to ensuring that the 21st century is another American Century.”

Black trained for covert operations and eventually became the director of the National Counterterrorism Center from 1999 until 2002. After the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks perpetrated by al-Qaeda, Black was appointed ambassador at large and coordinator for counterterrorism in December 2002 by President George W. Bush.

John Brennan succeeded Black in his job as director of the National Counterterrorism Center.

According to the American Thinker, “Cofer Black left the CIA in 2006 to join Blackwater, the huge contractor for services related to military and intelligence action, where he served as vice chairman until 2008.”

Mitt Romney: Trump Ukraine Call Transcript Is ‘Troubling’

Appearing Wednesday at The Atlantic’s annual ideas festival, Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) described the newly-released transcript of a conversation between President Donald Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky as “troubling.”

A transcript is as follows:

MCKAY COPPINS: The White House just released the call summary between President Trump and the president of Ukraine. What was your reaction? You’ve read it, I assume.

SEN. MITT ROMNEY: I have. My reaction was the same as I had a view days ago, which is this remains deeply troubling and we’ll see where it leads. The first reaction is troubling.

COPPINS: In the summary that we saw, did that amount to a quid pro quo or the implication of a quid pro quo, in your view?

ROMNEY: I don’t know if I’d focus so much on the quid pro quo element as perhaps some do. I’ve said this in my first reaction, if the President of the United States asks or presses the leader of a foreign country to carry out an investigation of a political nature, that’s troubling. Clearly, if there were a quid pro quo that would take it to an entirely more extreme level.

Read the full transcript of President Trump’s July call with Ukrainian leader Zelensky:

Featured image credit: Gage Skidmore – flickr.com/people/[email protected]

breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/26/former-mitt-romney-adviser-sits-on-burisma-board-of-directors/

“They Have Walked Into A Trap!” – Rudy Giuliani Destroys Democrat Party, FBI And Biden Crime Family — Must See Video

(Gateway Pundit) – President Trump personal attorney and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani went on with Laura Ingraham on Tuesday night following Nancy Pelosi’s big impeachment announcement.

Democrats announced on Tuesday they will open an impeachment investigation on President Trump for speaking to the Ukrainian president on the phone about the Biden Crime Family’s money laundering from the Ukrainian people.

Rudy was ON FIRE and dropped several bombs on the unsuspecting Democrats during the interview.

Rudy warned Democrats, “They have walked into a trap.”

Rudy dropped this bomb on the Biden Crime Family, “I have the records of $3 million payments laundered to Biden’s son. I have the records. I have the dates. It went from Ukraine, to Latvia to Cyprus, Cyprus to him. That’s called evidence of guilty knowledge… He got $1.5 billion from China! $1.5 Billion!… They bought the Vice President of the United States!”

Rudy then went on to explain his role in the Ukrainian investigation. They’re not going to intimidate me! I never realized the depth of the corruption! I never knew the depth of this corruption. It’s massive, it’s shocking. And if I played a role in getting that out I did a service to my country and I’m proud of it. And everything I did was legal and defensible.”

Laura continued to interrupt Rudy throughout the interview.

Rudy then broke this development. He was investigating Ukraine because the Ukrainian prosecutor installed by Biden dismissed the case on the organization that was collecting false information on Donald Trump, on Paul Manafort and feeding it to the Democratic National Committee. “That organization was run by George Soros who then hired the crooked FBI agent who is now working for George Soros.”

This was an amazing video!

thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/they-have-walked-into-a-trap-rudy-giuliani-destroys-democrat-party-fbi-and-biden-crime-family-must-see-video/

Senate Passes Democrat Motion To End Border Wall National Emergency

(Breitbart) – Senate Democrats passed Wednesday a motion to end President Donald Trump’s national emergency declaration to build a wall along the southern border.

The Senate passed S.J. Res. 54, 54-41, which would terminate President Trump’s national emergency declaration on the southern border. The resolution was created by Sen. Tom Udall (D-NM) and co-sponsored by Sens. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) and Susan Collins (R-ME).

Sen. Collins said the bill is not about “whether you’re for or against a border wall.” The Maine senator, who is up for a tough reelection fight in 2020, claimed that she has “consistently supported” funding for physical barriers on the southern border.

However, Congress has failed to provide significant funding to help secure America’s southern border by building a border wall. With Congress’ failure to provide funding, President Trump declared a national emergency to build the border wall, which diverted military funding so that the president can build a wall along the southern border.

The Republicans that voted for the resolution to end the national emergency to build a border wall are Sens. Collins, Lamar Alexander (R-TN), Pat Toomey (R-PA), Mitt Romney (R-UT), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Mike Lee (R-UT), Rob Portman (R-OH).

The vote arises as the Pentagon announced in September that they will delay or suspend 127 military construction projects so that $3.6 billion can be diverted to help secure America’s southern border.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said that many Republicans might decide to vote with Democrats because local military bases’ funds have been diverted towards funding the wall.

“I don’t think anyone, no matter what state they are from, will want to see money being taken away from their military installations, [which is] very much needed,” Schumer said Tuesday.

Congressional Democrats failed to pass the resolution to override Trump’s national emergency in March, which failed to override the president’s veto.

breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/25/senate-passes-democrat-motion-end-border-wall-national-emergency/

Just Released… Breaking: Full Transcript Of President Trump’s July Call With Ukrainian Leader Zelensky – 5 Pages – Here It Is…

(Gateway Pundit) – The Trump White House released the full transcript of the July call between President Trump and President Zelensky.

President Trump’s attorney Rudy Giuliani on Wednesday morning told FOX and Friends that he already heard the conversation between the two leaders.

The White House released the 5-page transcript this morning.

Via Jack Posobiec.

ANOTHER NON-SMOKING GUN: What The Transcript Of The Trump-Zelensky Call DOESN’T Say

There were two key assertions made by the mainstream media regarding a phone call between President Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky.

One, as reported by the Wall Street Journal in the initial story, was that “President Trump in a July phone call repeatedly pressured the president of Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden ’s son, according to people familiar with the matter.”

The second main contention was that Trump threatened to withhold hundred of millions of dollars in aid to Ukraine unless Ukraine investigated Biden’s son, who made millions of dollars from a Ukrainian company while his father was vice president — a clear quid pro quo.

The two assertions led Democrats on Tuesday to move forward with impeachment proceedings — before they even knew what the two leaders said.

But the newly released transcript shows that Democrats once again went off half-cocked. There’s no smoking gun whatsoever, just like the Russia collusion case. In fact, a reading of the transcript shows that Trump did neither.

Here’s exactly what Trump said regarding Biden’s son:

“I heard you had a prosecutor who was very good and he was shut down and that’s really unfair. A lot of people are talking about that, the way they shut your very good prosecutor down and you had some very bad people involved. Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the mayor of New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General. Rudy very much knows what’s happening and he is a very capable guy. If you could speak to him that would be great. The former ambassador from the United States, the woman, was bad news so I just want to let you know that. The other thing, There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it … It sounds horrible to me.”

That’s it. He never demanded Zelensky “investigate” Biden’s son, simply asks him to if he can “look into it.”

But that also has to be taken in context. Trump had previously expressed his interest in allegations that Ukraine had played some role in meddling with the 2016 election. Here’s what Trump said to the Ukraine president:

“I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike … I guess you have one of your wealthy people … The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.”

That was clearly an effort by Trump to probe backward into the 2016 election. That’s the “favor” Trump was asking — no pressure, just a favor.

As for that quid pro quo, that didn’t happen, either.

In the call, Trump told Zelensky the US has been “very, very good” to Ukraine.

“A lot of European countries are the same way, so I think it’s something you want to look at but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn’t say that it’s reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very, very good to Ukraine,” he said.

Zelensky agreed, telling Trump the United States has been a “much bigger partner” to Ukraine than other European countries regarding sanctions on Russia. Then he said Ukraine was “almost ready” to buy additional Javelin anti-tank missiles from the U.S.

Trump makes no mention of the $391 million in foreign aid that he had directed Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff, to put a hold days before the July 25 call. Trump has said that the money was put on hold to press foreign leaders in the region to pony up their own aid. The White House released the funds to Ukraine in September.

So, no quid pro quo, either.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is another non-smoking gun, brought to you by the Democrats.

Said Sen. Lindsey Graham on Twitter: “Wow. Impeachment over this? What a nothing (non-quid pro quo) burger. Democrats have lost their minds when it comes to President @realDonaldTrump.”

thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/just-released-breaking-full-transcript-of-president-trumps-july-call-with-ukrainian-leader-zelensky/

Schitt Show: Intel Chair Performs Fake Conversation Between Trump, Ukraine President – Pencil Neck Dunks On Self

(Breitbart) – House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) performed an entirely made-up conversation between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during his opening statement at a committee hearing Thursday morning.

The White House released a transcript of a phone call between Trump and Zelensky on Wednesday, but Schiff made up and fabricated his own own transcript that he read at the hearing, which sought to create a quid pro quo that Democrats have accused the president of making.

“This is the essence of what the president communicates,” Schiff began.

“We’ve been very good to your country. Very good. No other country has done as much as we have. But you know what? I don’t see much reciprocity here. I hear what you want. I have a favor I want from YOU though. And I’m going to say this only seven times so you better listen good,” Schiff read from his fabricated conversation.

“I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand? Lots of it,” he continued.

“On this and on that. I’m gonna put you in touch with people and not just any people,” he continued, affecting an accent meant to resemble Trump’s. “I’m going to put you with the attorney general of the United States, my attorney general Bill Barr. He’s got the whole weight of the American law enforcement behind him.”

“And I’m gonna put you in touch with Rudy, you’re gonna love him, trust me,” Schiff said, still avoiding any real quotations from the transcript. “You know what I’m asking, so I’m only going to say this a few more times, in a few more ways. And by the way don’t call me again. I’ll call you when you’ve done what I’ve asked.”

Schiff said of his made-up conversation, “This is in sum and character what the president was trying to communicate.”

Republican lawmakers slammed Schiff for making up the conversation entirely, instead of going off the transcript of what was actually said between Trump and Zelensky.

Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH) called the statement “fiction”:

While the chairman was speaking, I actually had someone text me, ‘Is he just making this up?’ And yes, yes he was. Because sometimes fiction is better than the actual words or the text. But luckily the American people are smart. They have the transcript, they’ve read the conversation, they know when someone is just making it up.

After Turner’s scolding, Schiff said his “summary of the president’s call was at least meant to be in part parody.”

He added, “The fact that that’s not clear is a separate problem in and of itself. Of course the president never said, “If you didn’t understand me, I’m going to say it seven more times.’ My point is, that’s the message the Ukrainian president was receiving in not so many words.”

Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-OH) accused Schiff of being intentionally misleading.

“I think it’s a shame that we started off this hearing with fictional remarks — the implication of a conversation that took place between a president and foreign leader, putting words into it that didn’t exist, they’re not in the transcript. And I would contend that they were intentionally not clear,” he said.

“The chairman described it as parody, and I don’t think this is the time or place for parody when we are trying to seek facts,” he added.

“And unfortunately today, many innocent Americans are going to turn on their TV and the media’s only going to show that section of what the chairman had to say, but I’m also glad to know that many Americans have seen this movie too many times and are tired of it.”

Video: Rep. Adam Schiff’s Full Opening Statement

breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/26/adam-schiff-performs-fake-conversation-between-trump-and-ukraine-president/

Breaking: John Solomon Has Documents That Prove Joe Biden’s Extortion Prevented Ukrainian Officials From Indicting His Son Hunter Biden

(Gateway Pundit) – Investigative journalist John Solomon told Sean Hannity on Wednesday night that he has over 400 pages of documents that he will reveal tomorrow that show Hunter Biden’s legal team worked with the Ukrainian prosecutors to end the investigation on the vice president’s son.

Joe Biden famously bragged on video how he had the investigator looking at his son’s Ukrainian gas deals to be fired.

Solomon says his news story is hitting tomorrow afternoon and it’s going to strongly dispute Joe Biden’s claim of why he got the Ukrainian top prosecutor fired.

Solomon will release the documents on Thursday that implicate Joe Biden in the Ukrainian scandal.

Video: Joe Biden Brags About Getting Ukranian Prosecutor Fired

Featured image credit: Gage Skidmore – flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/48573573437

thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/breaking-john-solomon-has-documents-that-prove-joe-bidens-extortion-prevented-ukrainian-officials-from-indicting-his-son-hunter-biden/

‘The Battle Lines Are Drawn’: 231 House Democrats Vote To Proceed With Impeachment Of Donald Trump

(Breitbart) – Every single member of the Democrat conference in the House of Representatives who voted on Wednesday went on the record backing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s extraordinary move earlier this week to open an impeachment inquiry via press conference, effectively confirming it is the sense of all 231 of them who voted with Pelosi that they intend to support impeaching President Donald Trump.

“The battle lines are drawn,” a senior House GOP aide directly involved in the effort to expose Democrats on the floor with recorded votes told Breitbart News on Wednesday evening. “We now know where every member of the House is on impeachment. And we know it is purely partisan.”

While the procedures are slightly D.C. insider-sounding, this vote, forced by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, represents the first time the lower Chamber of Congress has officially gone on record with regard to the impeachment of Trump, and it forces vulnerable Democrats who were waffling on whether to publicly back removal of the president from office by force on the record in support of the radical leftist wing of the party.

“Democrats were caught off guard by this,” the GOP aide said. “They were not ready to go on the record. ”

Pelosi announced on Tuesday late afternoon that the House is conducting an impeachment inquiry of the president, a move she made via press conference. Traditionally, when considering impeachment of an executive branch official, up to and including the president of the United States, the House of Representatives will vote to formally open proceedings. It has done this three times in recent history.

But, because Pelosi attempted to shield vulnerable Democrat members from battleground districts, she did not–as House Judiciary Committee ranking member Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA) has pointed out repeatedly–hold a formal vote to open the proceedings officially.

So, on Wednesday, McCarthy, the House Minority Leader, drafted a resolution formally condemning the way in which Pelosi launched the impeachment inquiry.

The text of the resolution that McCarthy introduced is as follows:

Whereas at a press conference on September 24, 2019, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi stated: “Therefore today, I’m announcing the House of Representatives is moving forward with an official impeachment inquiry.”

Whereas House Practice states that: “Under the modern practice, an impeachment is normally instituted by the House by the adoption of a resolution calling for a committee investigation of charges against the officer in question.”

Whereas in the past 25 years, the House of Representatives has moved forward with impeachment against a federal officer three times, each initiated by an impeachment inquiry resolution approved by the full House, not by a unilateral decree of the Speaker.

Whereas on May 12, 2009, the House approved H. Res. 424, authorizing and directing the Committee on the Judiciary to inquire whether the House should impeach Samuel B. Kent, a judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Whereas on January 13, 2009, the House approved H. Res. 15, authorizing and directing the Committee on the Judiciary to inquire whether the House should impeach G. Thomas Porteous, a judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Whereas on October 8, 1998, the House approved H. Res. 581, authorizing and directing the Committee on the Judiciary to investigate whether sufficient grounds exist for the impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States.

Whereas the Committee Report to accompany H. Res. 581 stated: “Because the issue of impeachment is of such overwhelming importance, the Committee decided that it must receive authorization from the full House before proceeding on any further course of action.”

Whereas that report further stated: “Because impeachment is delegated solely to the House of Representatives by the Constitution, the full House of Representatives should be involved in critical decision making regarding various stages of impeachment.”

Whereas the Speaker’s extraordinary decision to move forward with an impeachment inquiry without any debate or vote on such a resolution by the full House undermines the voting privileges afforded to each Member and the constituents they represent.

Whereas this unprecedented and politically motivated decision by Speaker Pelosi represents an abuse of power and brings discredit to the House of Representatives: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved: That the House of Representatives disapproves of the actions of the Speaker of the House, Mrs. Pelosi of California, to initiate an impeachment inquiry against the duly elected President of the United States, Donald J. Trump.

Since Democrats are in the majority, they control what votes happen on the floor. But as the GOP leader in the House of Representatives, even though he is in the minority, McCarthy has the ability–he is the only Republican with the ability–to force a vote on a privileged resolution almost immediately. So McCarthy did just that–he introduced the resolution as privileged and forced the full House of Representatives to vote on it on Wednesday evening:

Democrats fought back against McCarthy’s efforts, pushing what’s called a motion to table McCarthy’s privileged resolution. That is where the vote of record happened–a vote for the motion to table was a vote against the resolution, and vice versa. The motion to table succeeded along party lines, with 231 House Democrats voting for it and 193 House Republicans voting against it. Former Republican, now “Independent” Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan, also voted with the Democrats. Five Republicans and three Democrats did not vote.

In other words, in plain English, the Democrats, by shooting down McCarthy’s resolution, have now formally all gone on the record in support of Pelosi’s impeachment inquiry–and the Republicans have now all gone on the record against it. Even more plainly, this was the vote that formally opened impeachment proceedings. They are all on the record now.

No Democrat in the House of Representatives now claim it is not their intention to attempt to remove the duly elected president of the United States from office by force rather than by an election. They also cannot be ambivalent about it anymore. There is no more splitting hairs, no more supporting an “investigation” without backing impeachment, no more saying they need more facts to figure out what’s next. All the cards are on the table: Every Democrat in the House supports removing Trump from office and not waiting until November 2020 to have an election.

What’s more, in perhaps good news for Trump, he lost zero Republicans. The GOP is unified behind its president. Impeachment being partisan is an optics win for Trump, as it feeds his narrative that the Democrats are power-hungry and cannot beat him at the ballot box, so they are using extraordinary measures to attempt to seize the office by force.

“The Democrats can’t hide anymore,” a second senior GOP aide told Breitbart News. “Every last one of them now has the blood of this failed coup all over their hands. And America can see it.”

breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/25/the-battle-lines-are-drawn-231-house-democrats-vote-to-proceed-with-impeachment-of-donald-trump/

The Tide Turns: Democrats Freak Out After Transcript Reveals POTUS Trump Is On Crowdstrike Trail — He’s Going After Origins Of Russia Hoax!

(Gateway Pundit) – On Wednesday the Trump Administration released the White House transcript of President Trump’s call with President Zelensky of Ukraine.

In the transcript released today President Zelensky brought up Rudy Giuliani and his investigations with President Trump.

It was Zelensky who brought up the Biden investigation and NOT PRESIDENT TRUMP!

President Trump then asked Zelensky to look into the 2016 election including information on Crowdstrike.

The President did not ask President Zelensky to investigate Joe Biden as was widely reported by the lying mainstream media.

The transcript sent shock waves through the Democrat Deep State.

The transcript revealed President Trump is going after the origins of the Trump-Russia witch hunt.

Trump is going after the Deep State — Trump said he was going to clean the swamp and he meant it.

Foreign Policy expert Tony Shaffer says this is what the left is most worried about.

Rush Limbaugh focused on this bombshell from the transcript on his Wednesday show.

Now, just a little bit more about CrowdStrike ’cause I have paid attention, there’s not a single — I haven’t seen a single report focus on CrowdStrike in this transcript. Now, I know why the Democrats are ignoring it. The Democrats are bent out of shape that Trump even knows about CrowdStrike. They think Trump’s an idiot. With Trump specifically zeroing in on CrowdStrike the Democrats have learned today, after reading that transcript, what Trump is really doing here.

Trump is soliciting assistance from allies all over the world to help Barr prove the scam run against him. That’s what’s going on. That’s what the Democrats have learned today with that word “CrowdStrike” being in the transcript. CrowdStrike, the founder of CrowdStrike is a Russian emigre who hates Putin with a purple passion. It seems to color CrowdStrike’s security work.

Prime example being when CrowdStrike claimed that the Russians had hacked the Ukraine artillery software during the time Russia was invading Ukraine. CrowdStrike claimed the Russian hack caused the Ukrainians to fire on their own troops, killing thousands of them. They were dead wrong about it! And that’s a massive thing to be wrong about. Because the only problem was Ukraine said there was no such hack and no such battle and there were no such casualties.

They said that CrowdStrike had made all of it up. And guess what? CrowdStrike withdrew its report and admitted that it was wrong. Now, this, whether it sounds like it or not, don’t doubt me, this is highly relevant to this entire Russian collusion story, which is why Trump was asking about it and why the Democrats don’t want the Ukrainians to reinvestigate it.

The reference to CrowdStrike, mark my words, is momentous in this transcript today. I know damn well the whistleblower didn’t tell the Democrats about that or they would have a different strategy laid out for this. Because another thing — don’t doubt me on this — what this really means, folks, is that Trump — he was asking for assistance on Biden, but it’s all related. What Trump actually was asking the president of Ukraine to do was to help the attorney general.

President Trump is going after the criminal deep state.

He’s going after the criminals who lied and put America through the Trump-Russia witch hunt.

President Trump is going to clean the swamp.

This has Democrats scared to death.

thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/the-tied-turns-democrats-freak-out-after-transcript-reveals-potus-trump-is-on-crowdstrike-trail-hes-going-after-origins-of-russia-hoax/

ABC News Forced To Correct ‘Bombshell’ About Trump’s Ukraine Call

(Breitbart) – ABC News was forced Thursday morning to correct and walk back the latest Trump-Ukraine bombshell that wasn’t.

In a world where America enjoyed the services of legitimate news organizations, the far-left ABC News would have already retracted this story, would have removed it completely, because… As you will see below, the story is now a non-story. The central premise of the story has been wiped out by the facts. But, as we all know, ABC News is not a legitimate news organization, so let me welcome you to…

Russian Collusion 2: Even More Fake Newsier!

Oh, yeah, ABC News thought We got Drumpf now fer realzies! with the bombsheLOL revelation that the White House had set a very definite “precondition” for President’s Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Zelenskiy: a precondition that Joe Biden must be discussed!

Holy moly!

Smoking gun!

Frog march the Bad Orange Man out of the Oval Office in handcuffs right now!

But wait… It gets worse…

This bombshell was an “on the record” statement from no one less than one of Zelenskiy’s own advisers!

That’s it!

It’s over!

THE WALLS ARE CLOSING IN!!!!

Except for one little thing…

Well, actually two little things…

Okay, I lied, they are both big things…

Ginormous, really…

1) ABC’s source is not an adviser to the Ukrainian president. Oopsies.

2) The source did not tell ABC that discussing Biden was a precondition of the call. Oopsies.

In other words… The story is a fake, a fraud, doo doo, caca, dung, excrement, feces, garbage, fake news, a hoax, a con, a grift, a forgery, a scam, a sham, and did I properly welcome you to Russian Collusion 2: Even More Fake Newsier!

Now, as you know, I’m not going to link the ABC News story, because I don’t link fake news. But ABC was finally forced to add this teeny-weeny, itsy-bitsy, microscopic, hardly-even-matters correction:

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this article incorrectly described Serhiy Leshchenko as a current advisor to Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelenskiy. Leshchenko advised Zelenskiy’s transition team following his election in April but has since been distanced by the administration. He is no longer advising Zelenskiy.

And then there’s this from journalist Christopher Miller’s verified Twitter account: “Setting record straight: @Leshchenkos confirmed to me what those of us in Kyiv already knew—he is NOT currently an advisor to Ukraine’s Zelenskiy & wasn’t at time of July 25 call. He said he DID NOT tell ABC insistence for leaders to discuss Biden probe was precondition for call.”

Did you get that?

ABC’s source “DID NOT” tell ABC there was a precondition for the call.

And here’s how ABC News watered down the wording of its now not-so-bombshell:

“It was clear that [President Donald] Trump will only have communications if they will discuss the Biden case,” said Serhiy Leshchenko, an anti-corruption advocate and former member of Ukraine’s Parliament, who had been a former adviser to Zelenskiy but has recently been distanced from the administration. “This issue was raised many times. I know that Ukrainian officials understood.”

So ABC News has gone from “precondition” to “understood.”

Look at what just happened here…

ABC News went from… An adviser to Ukraine’s president says a Trump precondition meant that Trump would not take Zelenskiy’s call if Biden was not discussed! — to — Some guy who used to work for Zelenskiy but hasn’t for a long time says something was understood, or something.

To begin with, you don’t make an honest mistake about whether your source is or is not a current adviser to the president of Ukraine.

Sorry, you just don’t.

ABC News knew this story was a pile of crap and reported it anyway because that is what the media has been doing throughout the Trump era: Lie, lie, lie, lie, lie to win a news cycle against Trump, and then say oops.

Just like the Russia Collusion Hoax, we see this time and time and time again… As soon as the hoax falls apart, as the Ukraine Hoax did on Wednesday with the release of the phone call transcript, to cover up the debunking of their fake news, the media start hurling all the fake news they can get their hands on.

Yesterday, it was the far-left Washington Post with its fake news about Trump’s acting Director of National Intelligence threatening to resign. Today it’s ABC News straight-up lying about this.

Currently, 95 percent of Americans are troubled by the state of the media. Before the 2020 election is over, this will hit 99.9 percent. The holdouts will be Jim Acosta and Jake Tapper.

I could be wrong, but I honestly don’t think the overall public pays attention to the media anymore. They just roll their eyes and wait for it to be debunked, and it always is.

breitbart.com/the-media/2019/09/26/nolte-abc-news-forced-to-correct-bombshell-about-trumps-ukraine-call/

Recent Posts