WATCH: MSNBC Host Goes On WILD Anti-Trump Rant Right After Attack

Joy Reid of MSNBC asserts that the source of “actual violence” is not the Left, but rather the Right.

During a segment of her show on Monday, Reid said, “The irony of it is that the violence, the actual violence we’re seeing comes much more disproportionately from MAGA themselves, whether it’s January 6th, whether it’s them threatening election workers, whether it’s the bomb threats coming into schools in Springfield,”

“The violence is coming from them, from their own supporters, yet they try to portray Haitian immigrants as the people to fear,” she added.

Watch:

The Truth About Trump’s Attacker Finally Comes Out

Ryan Wesley Routh, aged 58, who is accused of attempting to assassinate former President Donald Trump, was arrested on Sunday. It has been reported that he displayed a Harris-Biden bumper sticker on a truck parked outside his residence in Hawaii.

The New York Post reported:

“The alleged gunman who targeted former President Trump had a Biden-Harris bumper sticker on the back of a pickup truck at his home in Kaaawa, Hawaii. Ryan Wesley Routh, 58, frequently posted about politics online and has exclusively donated to Democratic candidates and causes since 2019.”

The assassination attempt on Trump marked the second incident within a span of just over two months. In the initial attempt, the assailant, Thomas Matthew Crooks, had an almost nonexistent presence on social media; conversely, the current perpetrator, Routh, identified as a leftist who harbored animosity towards Trump and expressed support for Kamala Harris.

Routh was also fixated on the conflict in Ukraine, aligning himself with the Ukrainian cause, and had been interviewed by the New York Times regarding his initiatives to enlist volunteers to travel to Ukraine to combat Russian forces.

Politicians from various political affiliations denounced the assassination attempt; however, media outlets continued to attribute blame to Trump rather than to Democrats, suggesting that his supposedly incendiary rhetoric was a catalyst for political violence. Not a single media organization scrutinized its own discourse or that of Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party in relation to Trump.

WATCH: Secret Service Breaks Silence After Second Attack On Trump

On Sunday, local and federal officials announced during a press briefing that the Secret Service engaged an allegedly armed individual, an incident that is currently under investigation by FBI officials as a potential second assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump.

The Trump campaign issued a statement on Sunday afternoon confirming that the former president was “safe” following the gunfire that occurred near him while he was at the Trump International Golf Course in West Palm Beach. Although the U.S. Secret Service and the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Department did not disclose the suspect’s identity, they did confirm that he was armed with an AK-47 and other alarming items.

“Fortunately, we were able to locate a witness that came to us and said, ‘Hey, I saw the guy running out of the bushes, he jumped into a black Nissan and I took a picture of the vehicle and the tag,’ which was great. So we had that information. Our real time crime center put it out to the license plate readers and we were able to get a hit on that vehicle on I-95, as it was headed into Martin County,” Palm Beach County Sheriff Ric Bradshaw stated.

“Now in the bushes, where this guy was, is an AK-47 style rifle with a scope. Two backpacks which were hung on the fence that had ceramic tile in them and a GoPro, which he was going to take pictures of,” Bradshaw continued.

Bradshaw verified that officials were alerted to the incident at approximately 1:30 p.m., indicating that Trump was on the golf course during that time. The local sheriff reported that Secret Service agents advanced ahead of Trump to each hole, which enabled them to identify the suspect, who was seen with “a rifle barrel protruding from the fence,” prompting immediate action against that individual.

Furthermore, the local official mentioned that the former president was situated roughly 300 to 500 yards away from the alleged shooter. While authorities have yet to officially disclose the identity of the shooter, law enforcement sources informed FOX News that the individual in question is named Ryan Wesley Routh.

Watch:

Breaking: Whistleblowers Break Silence Over Hunter’s Lawyer

Whistleblowers Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, both affiliated with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), initiated a significant defamation lawsuit against Hunter Biden’s legal representative on Friday. In their testimonies presented to Congress in May and June 2023, Shapley and Ziegler accused officials within President Joe Biden’s Department of Justice (DOJ) of providing Hunter Biden with undue advantages during an investigation concerning his tax obligations and international business activities.

The two IRS whistleblowers, who have also disclosed additional information regarding Hunter Biden’s business operations and laptop, are now pursuing legal action against Abbe Lowell, the attorney representing the president’s son, in federal court. They are seeking a total of $20 million in damages, claiming that allegedly defamatory remarks have inflicted “incredible and malicious harm.”

“It is particularly ironic and damaging that a well-known attorney like Lowell — in his words, ‘one of the country’s foremost white collar defense and trial lawyers’ that is ‘widely viewed as counsel of choice for individuals facing government investigations and potential indictments’— has chosen to falsely accuse these special agents of criminal behavior,” reads the complaint, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. “Lowell’s stature and credibility in the legal community have amplified the harm caused by his defamatory statements. Lowell’s malicious and false allegations, including accusations that Shapley and Ziegler ‘committed felonies’ and ‘violated the law,’ were published to third parties, including the media, and have severely harmed their professional and personal reputations.”

The allegations against Lowell assert that he defamed both whistleblowers by making false and malicious claims regarding their supposed violations of grand jury secrecy regulations and taxpayer protection statutes. Furthermore, it is claimed that some of these defamatory remarks were significantly amplified by media coverage. Ziegler and Shapley are each pursuing $10 million in damages from Lowell.

Among the most critical allegations made by the whistleblowers are claims that the Biden Department of Justice initially denied Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss the authority to expand charges, that the Biden presidential transition team was informed in advance about plans to interview Hunter Biden, and that DOJ attorneys declined to collaborate with Weiss on the case.

In June 2023, Shapley disclosed a text message that Hunter Biden allegedly sent to a Chinese business associate in July 2017, in which he mentioned being “sitting here with [his] father” while awaiting the fulfillment of an unspecified “commitment.” Additionally, Shapley contended that the FBI had verified the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s laptop in November 2019, prior to its emergence as the subject of a New York Post article that was effectively suppressed by social media platforms, which claimed the laptop’s contents might be part of a sophisticated Russian operation aimed at disrupting the 2020 election.

The whistleblowers’ complaint highlights Hunter Biden’s recent guilty plea to multiple federal tax offenses in California as evidence that their concerns regarding a politically motivated investigation were justified.

“Though the Biden investigation was almost derailed, their efforts resulted in a new level of attention that led to criminal charges, and Biden has now pleaded guilty to all the charges of tax crimes brought against him,” the complaint states.

WATCH: Fox News Star Catches Kamala Harris In BIG Lie

On Friday, Fox News host Harris Faulkner remarked that Vice President Kamala Harris’ falsehoods during the debate with former President Donald Trump were so apparent that she could verify the Democratic presidential nominee’s statements from memory.

ABC News anchors David Muir and Linsey Davis faced backlash for their frequent interruptions of Trump throughout the debate, as well as for providing what they termed “fact checks” in response to his comments. Faulkner criticized the moderators for failing to fact-check when the vice president misrepresented Trump’s stance on in-vitro fertilization (IVF).

“When you switch to a broadcast network, they have a self-imposed journalistic integrity standard that they’re trying to uphold because they’re on the broadcast airwaves, they need to fact check more than I think something like the debate commission has typically done,” Brad Howard, a former Democratic aide on Capitol Hill, claimed.

“Why didn’t they do it for her?” Faulkner responded, with Howard claiming that Muir asked Harris about her changes in position on gun control and hydraulic fracturing or “fracking.”

Watch:

Top Biden Ally Hit With Devastating Charges

The House Foreign Affairs Committee announced on Thursday its intention to convene a review session to consider holding Secretary of State Antony Blinken in contempt of Congress due to his noncompliance with a subpoena requiring him to testify regarding the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Chairman Michael McCaul, a Republican from Texas, has scheduled this review session for September 19, during which the committee will deliberate on the possibility of holding Blinken in contempt. This action follows his failure to respond to a subpoena issued the previous week, which sought his testimony concerning the Afghanistan withdrawal, as stated in a press release.

Although Blinken has provided testimony before both the House and Senate on multiple occasions, the committee is adamant about obtaining additional testimony from him to inform potential legislative reforms designed to prevent similar situations in the future, according to the Washington Examiner. In response, State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller expressed disappointment regarding the new subpoena and highlighted Blinken’s significant prior cooperation with congressional investigations on this issue.

“The Secretary has testified before the Congress on Afghanistan more than 14 times — more than any other Cabinet-level official,” Miller said, the Washington Examiner reported. “It is disappointing that instead of continuing to engage with the Department in good faith, the Committee instead has issued yet another unnecessary subpoena.”

Democratic Representative Gregory Meeks of New York issued a statement denouncing McCaul’s proposal for a review session. He stated, “The upcoming Committee vote to hold Secretary Blinken in contempt, predicated on unfounded allegations of misconduct that their own inquiry has failed to substantiate, represents yet another episode in the political drama that Republicans are eager to prolong as we approach the election season.”

McCaul’s action comes in the wake of the House committee’s investigation into the withdrawal from Afghanistan, which concluded with a report released on Sunday. This comprehensive 354-page document criticized the Biden administration’s management of the withdrawal, which resulted in a resurgence of Taliban authority and was marred by a tragic suicide bombing at Kabul International Airport. The schedule for a possible House vote regarding the contempt resolution is still unclear, as Congress is presently focused on essential budget negotiations aimed at preventing a government shutdown by October 1, as reported by the Washington Examiner. After these negotiations, Congress is anticipated to take a recess until after the elections in November.

Google Caught RED-HANDED Right Ahead Of Election

A senior executive at Google has been recorded in an undercover video acknowledging that “Big Tech and large corporations” are “collaborating” to manipulate the 2024 election in favor of Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris. This startling revelation was brought to light by undercover journalist James O’Keefe. O’Keefe disclosed that Dakota Leazer, a Google Growth Strategist, informed an undercover reporter about a “coordinated initiative by Big Tech and major corporations” aimed at ensuring Harris’s victory in the upcoming election. He inadvertently indicated to the O’Keefe Media Group (OMG) journalist that Harris could effectively become the “next CEO” of Google and other prominent corporations.

Leazer added that it is “most profitable” for Google when Americans are in “crisis” and “fearful” of “some impending sense of doom” and that “democracy is going to end.”

“Google is a very liberal, progressive company,” Leazer gloated.

“If they have a belief that one side will allow them to make more money — at the very, very top I don’t think it’s political, I think it’s, like, economic.

“I think it’s all about, like, the shares and the stock price.”

Leazer proposed that political headlines driven by animosity contribute to the generation of advertising revenue for Google. He stated that the technology giant has endorsed advertisements featuring “rhetoric that was highly supportive of Kamala,” which appeared to direct users to credible news websites.

These political headlines that are generating clicks, which generates ad revenue, it’s all fueled out of hate,” Leazer was filmed boasting in the video.

“Google was essentially promoting through its ads, like, rhetoric that was very pro-Kamala, and it seemed to link out to legitimate news publication sites,” Leazer added.

“It would seem like it was an ad for PBS, but it was really an ad for the Kamala campaign or whatever.”

eazer continues by gloating that this is “a coordinated effort by Big Tech and big companies to try and get her to win — it’s definitely coordinated.”

“When you zoom out and look at who’s really pulling the strings of this country, it’s like a handful of billionaires, a lot of them are in tech, and it’s like tech controls the media, essentially,” Leazer said.

“Not completely, but it’s like you go to Google, they’re reorienting the search engine such that Kamala is more favored,” he added.

“Facebook, I feel like is promoting content that is favorable towards her.

“A lot of the AI stuff that’s sort of, like, liberating right now, is doing so in a way that’s generally favorable to her.”

Watch:

WATCH: Top Dem Caught In Blatant Lie On Live TV

Kellyanne Conway, a former official in the Trump administration, charged a Democratic guest with dishonesty regarding the Democratic Party’s stance on abortion during a Fox News segment on Sunday night. Minnesota’s Democratic Governor Tim Walz has endorsed state legislation that permits abortion at any point during pregnancy. In contrast, Democratic strategist Jose Aristimuno asserted that Democrats do not advocate for abortion up to the ninth month of pregnancy.

“She’s talked about the whole issue with some liberals in New York, I know Republicans love to remind people, no, Democrats want to make sure that — Democrats want women to get an abortion until nine months. That’s not true,” Aristimuno claimed after Fox News host Trey Gowdy asked what restrictions on abortion Vice President Kamala Harris supports. “It’s only through the first trimester. Most Democrats and most Americans would agree —”

A poll conducted by the Wall Street Journal in October 2023 revealed that 77% of Democrats supported the right of a woman to obtain an abortion for any reason.

In response to Aristimumo’s assertion that Democrats were open to imposing restrictions as early as eight weeks into a pregnancy, Conway stated, “That’s not true.”

“What’s the law? I’m sorry, I can’t have you lying when I’m sitting on the set,” Conway said. “What is the law in California and New York? Do you know what the law is in California and New York, New Jersey, Illinois and Colorado? It is not 8 or 12 weeks, sir.”

Watch:

Trump Just Got HUGE Election News… Kamala Harris Is Panicking

The FBI conducted a raid on his residence. For years, mainstream media has engaged in a campaign of misinformation to portray him as a Russian spy and insurrectionist. Certain factions within the Democratic Party aim to imprison him for an extended period, financially ruin him through legal battles, and dismantle his business empire. He is persistently labeled as a “felon,” a “racist,” a “rapist,” a “threat to democracy,” and even as the “next Hitler.” As his 2024 campaign began to gain momentum against Joe Biden, they resorted to extreme measures, undermining his efforts and promoting Kamala Harris’s unchallenged “joy” campaign, which is supported by substantial financial backing from corporate media.

Despite ALL of this… former President Donald Trump is leading incumbent Vice President Kamala Harris in a national poll conducted by the New York Times/Siena. In a direct matchup, he holds a one-point advantage, with 48 percent to 47 percent. When including third-party candidates, he leads by two points, 47 to 45 percent.

This survey, which involved 1,695 likely voters and was conducted from September 3-6, is regarded as a benchmark poll among Democrats and media elites, and the implications for them are decidedly unfavorable. This type of poll tends to dishearten those who are considered the most unfavorable individuals in society.

Throughout the entirety of 2020, Trump consistently remained at least eight points behind Joe Biden in this same poll. Additionally, his national polling never exceeded 41 percent. Currently, however, he is polling at 48 percent nationally.

Team Trump Announces HUGE Endorsement… This Is Big

Former President Donald Trump has established connections with organized labor in a manner that is uncommon for Republicans, resulting in a significant endorsement. The National Fraternal Order of Police, the largest police union in the nation, which represents approximately 378,000 law enforcement officers across the United States, has expressed its support for the former president.

“Public safety and border security will be important issues in the last months of this campaign,” Patrick Yoes, National President of the Fraternal Order of Police, said in a press release. “Our members carefully considered the positions of the candidates on the issues and there was no doubt—zero doubt—as to who they want as our President for the next four years: Donald J. Trump.”

“The FOP’s endorsement process is unique in that every member has the opportunity, through our 46 State Lodges, to make their choice known to the National Trustee. Once informed by the membership as to their choice, the National Trustee casts his or her vote at our National Board meeting. In order to secure our endorsement, the candidate needs the support of two-thirds of the State Lodges, a benchmark former President Trump easily cleared,” the press release said.

“During his first term, President Trump made it clear he supported law enforcement and border security,” the union’s president said. “In the summer of 2020, he stood with us when very few would. With his help, we defeated the ‘defund the police’ movement and, finally, we are seeing crime rates decrease. If we want to maintain these lower crime rates, we must re-elect Donald Trump.”

“Though this election was highly unusual, the FOP considered the two 2024 presidential candidates’ records—including President Trump’s responses to the FOP’s questionnaire, as well as a letter from the Harris-Walz campaign describing some of their positions on criminal justice and police labor issues. An FOP committee met personally with former President Trump, but no similar meeting was granted by the Harris-Walz campaign. This information was provided to the more than 377,000 members of the FOP so they could make their own decision in this election,” the organization said.

“As the nation’s oldest and largest law enforcement labor organization, the FOP’s presidential endorsement is one of the most sought-after endorsements by candidates running for the presidency,” the union president said. “The FOP is the number one voice of America’s law enforcement. We have a responsibility to our members, to the 700,000 sworn law enforcement officers in the United States, and to the communities they serve to do our part in determining the direction in which our country will head.”

“In every election cycle, the FOP pays close attention to which presidential campaign highlights the issues most vital to the men and women of the FOP, including the challenges faced by the rank-and-file law enforcement officers, the real issues in public safety, and the problems in our criminal justice system. The FOP has endorsed candidates—from both parties—that our members believe have made the men and women of law enforcement a priority: George H. W. Bush (1992); William J. Clinton (1996); George W. Bush (2000, 2004); John S. McCain III (2008); Donald J. Trump (2016, 2020). In 2012, the FOP voted not to endorse a candidate,” the organization said.

“The National FOP endorsed Donald Trump in 2016 and 2020. He led our nation through some very tough times,” the union president said. “He provided our nation with strong, effective leadership during his first term, and now that he is seeking election to a second term, we intend to help him win it.”

Recent Posts